Author

admin

Browsing

No Changes In Top-5

At the end of the week ending 2/7, there were no changes in the top-5, but there have been some significant shifts in the bottom 5 sectors. The most notable is the Consumer Staples sector which moved from 10th to 7th and the Healthcare sector which moved from 11th to 8th. Real Estate remained unchanged at the 9th position, while Energy dropped to 10th from 7th and Materials dropped to the last position from 8th.

New Sector Lineup

  1. (1) Consumer Discretionary – (XLY)
  2. (2) Financials – (XLF)
  3. (3) Communication Services – (XLC)
  4. (4) Industrials – (XLI)
  5. (5) Technology – (XLK)
  6. (6) Utilities – (XLU)
  7. (10) Consumer Staples – (XLP)*
  8. (11) Health Care – (XLV)*
  9. (9) Real Estate – (XLRE)
  10. (7) Energy – (XLE)*
  11. (8) Materials – (XLB)*

Weekly RRG

On the weekly RRG, the tails for XLY, XLC, and XLK are (still) inside the leading quadrant. XLK is just crossing over from improving. XLF is inside weakening but at a negative RRG-Heading, and XLI is moving deeper into the lagging quadrant at a negative RRG-Heading.

The most interesting observation on the RRG is that no sectors are currently positioned inside the improving quadrant. The Healthcare sector seems closest to crossing over, but, at the same time, is the sector with the lowest RS-Ratio reading.

Daily RRG

On the daily RRG, we can see why Staples and Healthcare made such big jumps. Both are pushing deeper into the leading quadrant on long tails.

Communication Services and Financials are confirming their positive outlook by continuing to move up on the RS-Ratio scale, with only a minimum loss of relative momentum so far. XLY has returned to the leading quadrant, but has already started to roll over. The positive thing for this sector is that it is all happening very close to the benchmark and on a very short tail.

Technology is the problem child on this RRG. This sector returned into the top-5 last week but is now again showing weakness on this daily RRG at the lowest RS-Ratio reading.

As I mentioned last week, the entry of XLK into the top 5 is not because of its strength but more as a result of weakness in other sectors. It’s all relative.

Consumer Discretionary

XLY is still holding above support, but last week formed a new peak. slightly lower, against the resistance offered by the mid-December peak. This makes the area between 235 and 240 an even more critical barrier now.

Important support remains located around 218. Relative strength is rolling over, but there is enough leeway for a correction after the strong move from August 2024 to now.

Communication Services

Communication Services is continuing to perform well and even managed to close higher than last week, confirming the uptrend in price. As a result, and given the weakness of other sectors and the SPY, relative strength for XLC is continuing to push the XLC tail further into the leading quadrant.

Financials

Financials also managed to put in a higher close for the week, confirming the current uptrend in price.

Relative strength has also taken out its previous high. When both price and RS can hold these trends, the RRG lines will soon turn up again and complete a leading-weakening-leading rotation, underscoring the attractiveness of the financials sector for the time being.

Industrials

Industrials did not manage to reach or take out its previous high and has now put a lower high in place. This still happening inside the rising channel, but it is not a sign of strength, so to say.

A similar thing can be said about the relative strength for XLI. With both RRG lines below a 100 and falling, the tail is being pushed further into the lagging quadrant.

Technology

The technology sector recovered well after a test of the lower boundary of its rising channel.

This is holding relative strength within the boundaries of the trading range which supports the slow improvement of the RRG lines. With RS-Ratio at 100.04, XLK has now just crossed into the leading quadrant.

Portfolio Performance

Shortly after the opening this Monday the portfolio is at a 4.01% gain vs 3.23% for SPY since the start of the year, picking up 0.78%.

Summary

The top-5 remains unchanged this week but in the bottom part of the list some noticeable changes are taking place, primarily in favor of defensive sectors like Healthcare and Consumer Staples, after Utilities already rose to the #6 position last week.

For the time being, the top-5 is still dominated by offensive sectors like XLY,XLC, and XLK. But how long will this last?

#StayAlert and have a great week. –Julius


The market rebounded to start trading on Monday, but indicators on Friday suggest internal weakness. Carl gives us his latest analysis on the market as well as taking a look at Gold which is making more all-time highs. Get Carl’s perspective on the Gold rally.

Besides looking at the market, Carl walked us through the DP Signal Tables and took a look at the Dollar, Gold, Crude Oil, Bonds, Yields, Gold Miners and Bitcoin.

Once he finished with his market review, Carl walked us through the daily and weekly charts of the Magnificent Seven which have mixed reviews on future price action.

Erin took the reins and analyzed sector rotation, concentrating on Energy, Technology and Utilities. She took a look under the hood to see if today’s rallies will catch on or not based on internal participation.

Symbol requests finished out the trading room with looks at various symbols of interest. Erin walked us through the daily and weekly charts with a few looks at 5-minute candlestick charts to time entries and exits.

Join us in the free trading room live to have your symbols reviewed and analyzed by registering ONCE at: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_D6iAp-C1S6SebVpQIYcC6g

We are also running a free two week trial of any of our reports. Use coupon code: DPTRIAL2 at checkout!

01:06 DP Signal Tables

07:35 Market Analysis

20:37 Magnificent Seven

28:05 Sector Rotation

35:51 Symbol Requests


The DP Alert: Your First Stop to a Great Trade!

Before you trade any stock or ETF, you need to know the trend and condition of the market. The DP Alert gives you all you need to know with an executive summary of the market’s current trend and condition. It not only covers the market! We look at Bitcoin, Yields, Bonds, Gold, the Dollar, Gold Miners and Crude Oil! Only $50/month! Or, use our free trial to try it out for two weeks using coupon code: DPTRIAL2. Click HERE to subscribe NOW!


Learn more about DecisionPoint.com:


Watch the latest episode of the DecisionPointTrading Room on DP’s YouTube channel here!


Try us out for two weeks with a trial subscription!

Use coupon code: DPTRIAL2 Subscribe HERE!


Technical Analysis is a windsock, not a crystal ball. –Carl Swenlin


(c) Copyright 2025 DecisionPoint.com


Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author, and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

DecisionPoint is not a registered investment advisor. Investment and trading decisions are solely your responsibility. DecisionPoint newsletters, blogs or website materials should NOT be interpreted as a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security or to take any specific action.


Helpful DecisionPoint Links:

Trend Models

Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO)

On Balance Volume

Swenlin Trading Oscillators (STO-B and STO-V)

ITBM and ITVM

SCTR Ranking

Bear Market Rules


Have you ever held on too long to a winning position? You watch as that former top performer in your portfolio slows down, and then rotates lower, and then really begins to deteriorate, and you just watch it all happen without taking action?

If the answer is “yes”, then you have fallen victim to one of the more frustrating of the behavioral biases called “endowment bias”. Basically, we feel unable to let go of this position because of our emotional attachment, and we hold on to a losing position despite very clear technical signs that we should do otherwise!

Today I’ll share three technical analysis techniques that I’ve found helpful to cut my losses, minimize the crippling impact of endowment bias, and preserve my portfolio through challenging periods.

When in Doubt, Follow the Trend

The biggest issue I find when it comes to endowment bias is that investors simply ignore clear signs on the chart. As my mentor Ralph Acampora once told me, “Analyzing the chart is the easy part. Actually doing what the chart tells you? That’s the tough part!”

The chart of Intel Corp. (INTC) in early 2024 shows how a stock can rotate from a period of accumulation to a period of distribution. In late 2023, INTC was making higher highs and higher lows, the price above two upward-sloping moving averages. The RSI was mostly above the 40 level, representing a bullish range for this momentum indicator. The relative strength (bottom panel) was steadily trending higher, demonstrating that INTC was outperforming the S&P 500.

By April of 2024, literally all of the previous bullet points had changed from bullish to bearish. INTC was now breaking down through moving average support, the moving averages were beginning to slope lower, and the RSI had moved to a bearish range below 60.

Think of technical indicators like a checklist, and go through the process of evaluating each indicator on the chart to determine whether the current reading is bullish or bearish. And when you get to a point when the bearish evidence outweighs in the bullish, then move on to better opportunities!

Relative Strength Can Bring Additional Clarity

Sometimes a stock will stop going higher, but instead of breaking down it enters a new consolidation phase. Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) showed this particular phenomenon in 2024, as it entered a trading range between $400 and $460 after a new all-time high in July.

Now even though the price trend was now sideways, note how the relative strength line began to trend steadily lower. This pattern emerged because MSFT was holding support, so the price trend was still in decent shape, but other stocks were continuing to pound out a strong second half to 2024.

When you’re holding a stock with deteriorating relative strength, your “opportunity cost alarm” should be going off big time. Basically, while you’re not necessarily losing money holding this particular stock, there are other stocks out there that are still moving higher. So by tying up your capital in this particular stock, you’re missing out on other opportunities to outperform!

Institutional investors tend to be laser-focused on relative strength, as that is pretty much exactly how they are evaluated as active managers. So think like an institutional investor, and if your charts begin to feature weakening relative strength, look around for other places to outperform.

Divergences are Often an Early Warning Signal

Parts of the technical toolkit can be used more as leading indicators than lagging indicators. I’ve found bearish momentum divergences to provide excellent early warning signals, because they will raise a red flag while the primary uptrend is still in place.

The chart of Synchrony Financial (SYF) still appears in decent shape, with a pattern of higher highs and higher lows continuing through early 2025. But notice how the RSI has actually been making lower peaks since early November, despite the stronger price action?

SYF and similar names will usually find a place on my “potential topping patterns” ChartList, helping me focus on charts that are still going higher yet demonstrating similar characteristics to previous market tops. I’m happy to still own a chart like SYF as long as the price keeps showing strength, but the bearish divergence tells me to be ready to take profits if the impending drop becomes a reality.

Mindless investors ignore clear signs of price deterioration because endowment bias prevents them from admitting a change in the technical evidence. Mindful investors, however, have a consistent process for evaluating their holdings, and are more easily able to admit when a chart is no longer helping them achieve their portfolio goals.

RR#6,

Dave

P.S. Ready to upgrade your investment process? Check out my free behavioral investing course!


David Keller, CMT

President and Chief Strategist

Sierra Alpha Research LLC


Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

The author does not have a position in mentioned securities at the time of publication. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

Graphene has the potential to spur advances in a variety of sectors, from transport to medicine to electronics. Unfortunately, the high cost of graphene production has slowed commercialization.

Graphene prices have come down substantially from its early days, when it reportedly cost tens of thousands of dollars to make a piece of high-quality graphene the size of a postage stamp.

However, the 21st century wonder material remains expensive. Specific graphene pricing data is hard to come by, but relatively recent estimates peg the commercial cost of graphene in a range of US$100 to US$10,000 per kilogram. The wide variance is mainly because the price of graphene is determined by a number of factors, such as production method, form, quality and quantity.

Graphene has many exciting applications. Notably, its properties have been applied to graphene-polymer composites. Together, these carbon-based materials are effective in energy, biomedicine, aerospace and electronics applications. In addition, graphene can be used for water purification due to its naturally occurring water-repellent properties.

Other key applications of graphene include graphene-conductive inks, which can be used for printed electronics in applications like logic circuits, inkjet printing, environmental sensors and smart clothing.

Here’s a look at how graphene is made, and why the production process plays a key role in graphene cost.

In this article

    What is the origin of graphene?

    Graphene’s origin story is by now well known. The 2D material was first produced in 2004, when two professors at the University of Manchester used Scotch tape to peel flakes of it off a chunk of graphite.

    The story gives the impression that it’s easy to make graphene, but that’s not entirely true. The Scotch tape method, while a fun party trick, can only produce a very small amount of graphene — certainly not enough to use commercially.

    How is graphene made?

    The Scotch tape method of making graphene is known as exfoliation, and there are other ways to create graphene via exfoliated graphite as well. For instance, a diamond wedge can cleave graphene layers.

    But what are some other ways of making graphene? Currently, the most popular method is chemical vapor deposition (CVD). The deposition process involves a mix of gases reacting with a surface to create a graphene layer. The process creates high-quality graphene, but the graphene is often damaged when it comes time to detach it from its substrate.

    Looking at the process in greater depth, Graphenea states that another problem with CVD is that it’s difficult to create a totally uniform layer of graphene on a substrate. Graphenea also notes that much work is being put into reducing problems with CVD. For example, scientists are experimenting with treating the substrate before the reaction that creates graphene takes place. Even so, it’s expected to take a long time for the wrinkles to be smoothed out.

    The Graphene Flagship identifies a number of other ways of making graphene, including direct chemical synthesis; the material can also be made by putting natural graphite in a solution.

    Some of the latest innovations in graphene creation don’t involve the use of chemicals and can be conducted in the open air, as opposed to in vacuums. One method that was patented in 2017 is able to create larger quantities of graphene using acetylene, oxygen and a spark plug. Unfortunately, this process creates unrefined chunks of material and not sheets, meaning more money must be spent to make the graphene chunks useable.

    In 2021, the Indian Institute of Technology Patna developed a way to produce graphene using a plasma gun; it’s possible it will prove to be a cheaper, yet scalable route to producing high-quality graphene material. The method has been shown to produce single-layer graphene 85 percent of the time without hazardous chemicals or expensive solvents, and estimates show that doing so only costs about US$1.12 per gram of graphene.

    In mid-2022, chemical manufacturing company CleanGraph announced its proprietary process for transforming graphite into graphene, saying it had been developed over the past four years with the help of partnerships with market leaders in the construction industry and prominent universities. This method of producing graphene reportedly reduces the environmental impact by 99 percent compared to traditional graphene production.

    ‘Expanded graphite is a layered nanocarbon material, which is produced at industrial scale by oxidative intercalation and high-temperature expansion of natural graphite. CleanGraph is a novel proprietary process to chemically modify graphite into various forms of graphene in a faster, more productive and ecologically friendly way,’ as per the company.

    Along with construction materials, the graphene produced by this method can also be used for heating, battery technology and as a sorbent.

    More recently, in late 2023 NanoXplore (TSX:GRA,OTCQX:NNXPF) unveiled a new proprietary large-scale dry process for manufacturing graphene based on advanced exfoliation technology. It has a lower CAPEX compared to liquid-based exfoliation methods.

    ‘The technology finds potential applications in batteries and lightweight composites, enhancing its appeal in cutting-edge industries,’ states the company. ‘This new manufacturing process also opens doors to a myriad of applications, including plastic pipes, geosynthetics, recycled plastics, concrete, drilling fluids, and insulation foams, among others.’

    Click here for a deeper dive on companies developing graphene and graphene products.

    What factors impact graphene cost?

    Getting an understanding of how graphene is produced is crucial to understanding graphene cost. That’s because the way in which graphene is made has a major impact on how much it ultimately costs.

    Echo Zhang, founder of China-based graphene technology company GrapheneRich, explains that CVD and liquid-phase exfoliation are the most expensive methods due to the ‘advanced equipment and high energy consumption required.’ Meanwhile, the chemical reduction of graphene oxide is cheaper but may produce lower quality material.

    Graphene oxide, which has advanced composite, biotechnology and water filtration applications, can cost between US$100 and US$500 per kilogram. ‘The price can vary depending on the oxidation level, production method, and supplier,’ Zhang states.

    Graphenea also highlights that while graphene oxide is relatively inexpensive to produce, its lower quality means it can’t be used in batteries, flexible touch screens and ‘other advanced opto-electronic applications.’

    In contrast, CVD graphene, which Zhang calls ‘top-tier graphene’ resulting in a ‘high-performance material with excellent properties,’ fetches upwards of US$10,000 or more per kilogram. Its often used in advanced electronics and energy-storage systems.

    ‘Methods like CVD, which produce high-quality, high-purity graphene, are generally more expensive than liquid-phase exfoliation or reduction of graphene oxide,’ Zhang explains. ‘The production method affects both the quality and the cost of the final product.’

    Commercial-grade graphene can be produced in larger quantities, resulting in a price range of US$100 to US$1,000 per kilogram. This grade of graphene is used in energy storage, sensors and composites. ‘These prices depend on the production scale and the quality of the graphene being produced,’ Zhang states.

    The issue, of course, is that with few commercial applications for graphene yet available, few end-users are looking to buy the material in large quantities.

    What is the future of graphene research?

    Those involved in graphene research hope that ultimately more commercial applications for the material will be developed, spurring advances that will make cost-effective mass production of the material a reality.

    Graphene products are making their way into next-generation electronics such as flexible and foldable screens, enhanced batteries and ‘lightning-speed’ computers.

    Graphene can also be used to create more fuel-efficient cars, faster and lighter aircraft and paint that could end deterioration of ships and cars. Overall, there’s no shortage of applications for graphene products.

    Graphene’s impressive properties and the fact that it’s made from carbon, much like human bodies, makes it well suited to biotechnologies, including tools that can help healthcare professionals scan a patient’s biosignals quickly, accurately and safely.

    “Graphene is a single layer of carbon molecules,” explained Dr. Kiana Aran, chief scientific officer at Cardea Bio, and Keck Graduate Institute associate professor of bioengineering. “Everything in our body is made of carbon. It’s the most compatible material we can find that has amazing electronic properties. You can build electronics and conjugate with biology, without impacting … biology and without biology impacting it.”

    Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology have created the first functional semiconductor made from graphene. As an alternative to silicon, the breakthrough has the potential to allow for smaller and faster electronic devices, which may have applications for quantum computing.

    In terms of market growth, Grand View Research notes, ‘Market growth stage is high, and pace of the market growth is accelerating. Graphene market is characterized by a high degree of innovation owing to rising advancements driven by factors including research and development. Subsequently, innovative applications are constantly emerging, disrupting existing industries and creating new ones.’

    The market research firm projects that the graphene market will see revenues grow at a compound annual growth rate of 35.1 percent between 2024 and 2030 to reach US$1.61 billion. The automotive, aerospace and medical industries are the core drivers of demand for the material. Graphene’s role as a powerful catalyst in the chemical industry is also expected to contribute to increased demand for the wonder material on a global scale.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, currently hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    There’s been a great deal of speculation surrounding a potential Starlink initial public offering (IPO), and the idea of an impending Starlink stock release date has investors excited.

    Elon Musk’s satellite internet business been referred to by many as the future of global connectivity, offering low latency and high speed in even the most remote locations. The company controls roughly 7,000 satellites and recently surpassed over 4 million subscribers.

    One reason for this interest is Musk’s reputation in the investment space, as he has been involved in multiple highly successful and high-profile tech companies. Starlink itself is an offshoot of one of his other companies, SpaceX.

    Even without Musk’s involvement, Starlink has immense market potential. A lack of connectivity is one of the most significant bugbears facing the proliferation of technology like autonomous vehicles and the internet of things. By removing this restriction, Starlink could cultivate a flood of invention and innovation and allow edge computing to thrive.

    The company’s satellites have been deployed in countries around the world in recent years. In June 2023, parent company SpaceX was awarded a contract by the Pentagon in the US to provide internet terminals for use in Ukraine. A few months later, following the launch of its war on Hamas, Israel entered into talks with SpaceX to secure the use of Starlink satellites as a backup communications system.

    Additionally, the company launched a US$90 million deal with Mexico in November 2023 to provide free internet to remote regions, and Telstra Group (ASX:TLS,OTC Pink:TTRAF) became one of the first service providers to offer Starlink connectivity to rural Australians in July of that year.

    More recently, the company has been making significant inroads into African countries, including Zimbabwe, Niger, Liberia, and Musk’s native country of South Africa.

    In September 2024, Starlink inked a contract with United Airlines to provide in-flight wifi. A few months later, Starlink secured a deal with the Canadian province of Ontario to bring high-speed satellite internet access to homes and businesses in rural, remote and northern communities beginning in June 2025.

    Will Starlink go public? Although a Starlink IPO has yet to be officially announced, there has been a great deal of speculation, and some experts have suggested that the occasion may be closer than many realize. That speculation has increased with US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House, and the possibility of more lucrative contracts for the satellite technology company. With that in mind, those considering a Starlink investment must ensure they understand the company and its technology as soon as possible.

    In this article

      What is satellite internet?

      A satellite internet connection transmits and receives data via a network of near-Earth satellites. Though this technology isn’t new, it has evolved considerably over the past several years. At the time of its inception, it was generally only used by subscribers in remote areas who had few other options for connectivity.

      The history of satellite internet traces back to 1962, with the world’s first commercial communication satellite. Known as Telstar 1, the satellite was launched by NASA in response to Russia’s successful launch of the satellite Sputnik 1. It had a short life, however; Telstar launched one day after high-altitude nuclear weapons testing, and radiation from the tests damaged electronics on the satellite. It was only operational for seven months before it was rendered inoperable.

      Interestingly, the idea of transmitting information via satellite wasn’t new at the time of Telstar’s launch. Decades earlier, astronautics theorist Herman Potočnik first proposed the concept of geostationary orbital satellites in his 1929 book ‘Das Problem der Befahrung des Weltraums: der Raketen-Motor,’ which translates to ‘The Problem with Space Travel: the Rocket Motor.’ Renowned futurist Arthur C. Clarke would later cite Potočnik’s work in a 1945 paper envisioning satellite communication.

      The first real use of satellite internet would not occur until the late 20th century via the Teledisc project, funded by Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT). First proposed in 1994, Teledisc planned to establish a network of low-orbit broadband satellites. Unfortunately, the project was rendered defunct in 2002 shortly after the failure of two similar ventures, Iridium and Globalstar.

      One year later, in 2003, French satellite operator Eutelsat became the first company in the world to launch a successful satellite internet project. Since then, multiple service providers and telecommunications companies have dabbled in satellite connectivity. However, it has largely lagged behind its technological peers, primarily only seeing use in particularly isolated regions.

      To explain why, we need to first explain the different types of internet. The two most common are land-based connections and cellular or mobile connections.

      Landline internet uses telephone lines, coaxial cables or dedicated fiber-optic cables to send and receive data from a modem or router. This device then serves as an access point, allowing everything from computers to smart home appliances to connect to the internet. Mobile internet, meanwhile, leverages nearby cell phone towers to beam data directly to and from connected devices.

      Traditional satellite internet is something of a fusion between mobile and landline, albeit over a vastly larger distance. It leverages a satellite dish connected to two modems. One modem is used for sending data and the other for receiving.

      Historically, speed and capacity represent the two most significant drawbacks to satellite internet. Most satellite internet service providers only support speeds between 25 and 300 megabits per second (mbps). By contrast, landline fiber internet is capable of speeds up to 5 gigabits per second (gbps). Satellite internet also tends to be far costlier than a comparable landline connection, with higher latency and lower caps on data usage. It may also suffer from issues with reliability. Lastly, satellite internet may suffer from interference due to factors such as terrain or canopy coverage.

      That brings us around to what makes Starlink exciting. Although not yet competitive with landline internet in terms of cost, the company offers considerably higher data caps and speeds than any other provider on the market — up to 500 mbps with a 1 terabyte cap. Starlink’s low-orbit satellites are also less vulnerable to geographic interference while offering more consistent and reliable coverage.

      Does Starlink have an IPO date?

      At the time of this writing, Starlink is not publicly traded, and there is no concrete date for a Starlink IPO. Hints of a possible Starlink IPO originally came from several tweets made by Musk in 2021.

      ‘Once we can predict cash flow reasonably well, Starlink will IPO,’ he explained at the time. ‘(It will be) at least a few years before Starlink revenue is reasonably predictable. Going public sooner than that would be very painful.’

      Musk added later that year that Starlink’s parent company SpaceX ‘needs to pass through a deep chasm of negative cashflow over the next year or so to make Starlink financially viable.’

      At the time, Musk said a Starlink IPO wasn’t likely until at least 2025 or later.

      It’s no surprise then that market watchers’ eyebrows rose when listening to SpaceX President and Chief Operating Officer Gwynne Shotwell speak at the February 2023 Commercial Space Transportation Conference. While discussing a planned testing milestone for SpaceX’s rockets, Shotwell claimed that 2023 was the year Starlink would make money.

      She added that the company had a cashflow-positive quarter in 2022. There was also SpaceX’s reported revenue for 2022 — just over US$3.3 billion, US$1 billion of which originated from Starlink.

      In early November 2023, Musk reported that Starlink had once again “achieved breakeven cashflow.’

      Shortly after, an anonymous source told Bloomberg that a Starlink IPO could be on the table for 2024. But Musk quickly fired back in a post on X that the report was “false.”

      It seems fairly clear based on Musk’s comments that we shouldn’t expect a Starlink IPO anytime soon. So why is there so much speculation that one is just around the corner?

      Well, for one thing Starlink sales dominated SpaceX’s 2023 revenues, meaning the company made more money as an internet provider than as a space rocket company. Starlink revenues topped a massive US$4.2 billion that year, compared to US$3.5 billion for the firm’s core rocket launch business.

      Of course, these figures should be taken with a very large grain of salt. As is too often the case in technology investing, there is no shortage of hype surrounding Starlink, much of it drummed up by Musk himself. An April 2024 BNN Bloomberg article points out that even with all that revenue, Starlink “is still burning through more cash than it brings in.” Based on anonymous inside sources, Starlink accounting is “more of an art than a science.’

      Even if those numbers are inflated, the company does show promise, and analysts are still optimistic that a Starlink IPO is on the horizon. Justus Parmar, founder and CEO of venture capital firm Fortuna Investments, told Reuters he’s eyeing 2025 or 2026. “(Musk’s) waiting for a level of stability or predictability in revenue,” he said. Once the IPO is official, Parmar believes it will “be an extremely strong catalyst for everything space related.”

      How can you get exposure before the Starlink IPO date?

      While it’s impossible to invest directly in Starlink, you may be able to get a head start by investing in Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), as Musk stated he’ll ‘do his best’ to give preference to long-term Tesla shareholders. Additionally, there are platforms such as Hiive that enable accredited investors to purchase shares of pre-IPO companies, including SpaceX.

      Fortunately, you have several options if you simply want to invest in satellite internet and aren’t particularly attached to the idea of Starlink. In spite of their failed efforts in the early 2000s, both Iridium Communications (NASDAQ:IRDM) and Globalstar (NYSEAMERICAN:GSAT) are currently going strong. Globalstar’s performance is especially promising, as the company’s share price has increased in value by almost 300 percent over the past five years as of mid-January 2025.

      EchoStar (NASDAQ:SATS) is another satellite provider that’s performed strongly in recent years. Other potential satellite internet investments include ViaSat (NASDAQ:VSAT) and Gilat Satellite Networks (NASDAQ:GILT).

      As with any investment, it’s important to do your research and speak to an accredited brokerage or investment advisor before you commit any capital.

      Investor takeaway

      From an investment perspective, Starlink displays incredible promise. The company’s ties to Musk, a man with an established track record of successful technology startups, has generated considerable interest out of the gate. Yet even ignoring the connection to Musk, Starlink has a massive potential addressable market thanks to ongoing demand for better connectivity and a relative dearth of viable options for edge computing.

      Trends such as distributed work and the proliferation of internet of things devices will only further drive this demand.

      With that said, it’s best to exercise a degree of restraint where Starlink is concerned. Although the company will very likely be a sound investment once it or SpaceX goes public, there is currently a great deal of exaggerated hype and speculation surrounding it. Anyone who chooses to add Starlink shares to their portfolio if the company does go public should first ensure they understand what to expect — something they cannot do by listening to hype alone.

      Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

      This post appeared first on investingnews.com

      Here’s a recap of the crypto landscape for Monday (February 10) as of 9:00 p.m. UTC.

      Bitcoin and Ethereum price update

      Bitcoin is trading at US$97,304, reflecting a 1.1 percent increase over the past 24 hours.

      The day’s trading range has reached a high of US$97,896 and a low of US$96,882.

      Meanwhile, Ethereum is priced at US$2,679.41, up 1.6 percent over the same period. The cryptocurrency reached an intraday high of US$2,689 and a low of US$2,645.

      Altcoin price update

      • Solana (SOL) is currently valued at US$200.82, marking a 0.6 percent increase over the past 24 hours. The cryptocurrency hit a daily high of US$207.25 and a low of US$201.15.
      • XRP is at US$2.43, up 0.8 percent. It reached an intraday high of US$2.45 and a low of US$2.41.
      • Sui (SUI) is trading at US$3.24, up 5.6 percent. It achieved a daily high of US$3.28 and a low of US$3.23.
      • Cardano (ADA) is priced at US$0.7045, reflecting a 3.3 percent increase over 24 hours. Its highest price on Monday was US$0.7104 and its lowest was US$0.6969.

      Crypto news to know

      Japan-based Bitcoin treasury company Metaplanet (OTCQX:MTPLF,TSE:3350) released its full-year 2024 earnings on Monday, revealing roughly US$36 million in unrealized gains from the purchase of 1,761 Bitcoin.

      The company said it acquired the coins for roughly US$137 million.

      Metaplanet’s shareholder base grew by 500 percent last year, primarily due to the issuance of new shares to fund its Bitcoin acquisition strategy. This growth was facilitated by both debt and equity financing.

      Metaplanet said it will increase its Bitcoin holdings to 10,000 Bitcoin by the end of 2025, and 21,000 Bitcoin by the end of 2026. The company’s shares closed up 17.37 percent on Monday afternoon.

      CoinShares data shows Ether exchange-traded product (ETPs) inflows outpaced inflows to Bitcoin ETPs during last week’s market decline. Ether ETPs recorded US$793 million in inflows, 95 percent more than Bitcoin’s recorded inflows of US$407 million. Total year-to-date inflows to digital asset investment products have reached US$7.3 billion.

      According to CoinShares’ James Butterfill, last week’s price fall resulted in significant buying on weakness.

      Strategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) resumed buying Bitcoin last week, acquiring 7,633 Bitcoin for approximately US$742.4 million in cash at an average price of roughly US$97,255 per coin, as per US Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

      Strategy’s Michael Saylor hinted at another impending Bitcoin acquisition on Sunday (February 9) morning, posting a screenshot of the Saylor Tracker, a tool that monitors and tracks Strategy’s Bitcoin holdings.

      “Death to the blue lines. Long live the green dots,’ he wrote on X, formerly Twitter. Market watchers have come to recognize these posts as indicators of the company’s upcoming Bitcoin purchases.

      Meanwhile, fraud allegations have resulted in a rapid pullback for $CAR, a meme coin launched on Sunday by the Central African Republic. President Faustin-Archange Touadera described the coin as an ‘experiment’ to raise the country’s global profile and showcase how a meme-based token can support national development.

      However, shortly after $CAR’s launch, the coin’s X account was suspended, and allegations of fraud soon surfaced, with deepfake checker tool Deepware flagging a video statement from Touadera as suspicious. The news has caused $CAR’s price to pull back over 92 percent, from US$0.79 to US$0.05 as of Monday afternoon.

      Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

      Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

      This post appeared first on investingnews.com

      Gold has long served as a tool for investors to enhance their portfolios and protect against volatility.

      At the Vancouver Resource Investment Conference, CEO Jay Martin engaged with industry experts Frank Giustra, Grant Williams, Alastair Still and David Garofalo to explore trends currently affecting the sector.

      The group illustrated a market at a crucial juncture, with changing investor sentiment, geopolitical tensions and impending financial instability converging to potentially create the perfect storm.

      Eastern vs. western perspectives on gold

      Martin kicked the panel off by reviewing the last several years in the gold market. Looking back at 2019 and 2020, he noted that an influx of western investors helped pushed the metal’s price to phenomenal levels.

      However, as the fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic drove inflation and interest rates, these investors became sellers, and gold started to sink. Capitalizing on these lower price points, central banks moved into the market and not only stabilized the price, but caused it to surge to all-time highs. By mid-2024, gold was 70 percent above its 2022 low.

      Frank Giustra, CEO of the Fiore Group, largely agreed with Martin’s summary of gold’s activity, but added that while he thinks central bank buying will continue, there is more going on than meets the eye.

      “What most people don’t understand about gold is that it’s not that the gold price is going up — it’s the fact that the fiat currencies that are measured against it are going down in value for a whole host of reasons,’ he said.

      Giustra sees the US fiscal situation as a factor pushing the gold price up, and suggested that the situation is not only beyond repair, but also on the precipice of a crisis. “At some point there will be a US dollar crisis. It’s going to happen in our lifetimes, probably sooner rather than later, and when that happens, gold will go through the roof,’ he noted.

      Grant Williams, author at Things That Make You Go Hmmm, expanded on Giustra’s point, outlining a critical difference between the east and west. “In the east, people don’t buy gold to sell it because the price has gone up. They buy gold to own it, and when they do sell it, it’s because they need to raise money for something important,” he said.

      Williams also suggested that the west is at the end of a cycle. In his view, investors are attempting to maximize their returns in any way possible, and the system is corrupt and lacks consequences.

      “This is going to come to a head. We’re in the middle of that process now, and at the end of that process, when these cycles fall over, the one thing you want to own is gold,’ he explained at the conference.

      ‘We are moving into the part of this where it’s not just a good idea to own gold anymore — it’s essential to own gold. And I think the price is going to reflect that in the coming 12 to 18 months.’

      Tech stocks, Bitcoin distracting investors from gold

      The panelists agreed that today’s investors are distracted as tech and Bitcoin dominate headlines.

      While technology stocks still follow the typical market ebbs and flows, cryptocurrencies are a different story.

      Giustra even compared the crypto space to a Ponzi scheme, pointing to one influential commenter who has suggested that Bitcoin will reach a value of US$13 million and gold will reach zero.

      “These are ridiculous statements, but he needs to make those kinds of statements to keep the greed factor going. In any pyramid scheme, you need to have new buyers all the time to keep the game going,” he said.

      Giustra also outlined how the cryptocurrency space has influenced the recent US election, spending US$245 million to influence Congress and the incoming president to ease regulations. This comes from a shifting narrative that implies crypto is a store of value. Giustra believes it’s an asset class in search of a purpose.

      GoldMining (TSX:GOLD,NYSEAMERICAN:GLDG) CEO Alastair Still backed Giustra, saying that unlike gold, Bitcoins can be created every day, while gold’s limited supply is inherently connected to its store of value.

      Still described how resource scarcity has been tested, outlining how geopolitically stable jurisdictions are diminishing. At the same time, mining companies have underinvested in exploration and been slow to find new assets.

      “So while I think many investors are a little behind the curve,’ he explained at VRIC.

      ‘What we have seen is the major operating companies, they’re running deficits in their reserves, so they’re not replacing what they’re mining, and that’s because they’ve been underfunding exploration for years.’

      Gold majors dealing with low grades, declining reserves

      The systemic underfunding of exploration could be an opportunity for explorers and developers to start acquiring projects that will be sought by majors in the future. As it stands, miners are having to maximize extraction efforts.

      “The operators are mining lower grades. That doesn’t necessarily mean they’re making more gold. They might make more profit, but they are actually potentially mining less gold,” Still commented.

      David Garofalo, CEO, president, chairman and director at Gold Royalty (NYSEAMERICAN:GROY), agreed that operators are facing a challenge. “They’re facing a squeeze from tiny reserves, and reserves are down 40 percent. That’s demonstrated because the juniors haven’t had access to capital for over a dozen years,” he said.

      He went on to explain that the entire industry is facing cost pressures.

      All-in-sustaining costs have risen along with the price of gold, leading to a squeeze among producers. Much of this is due to inflation, which has resonated throughout the general economy.

      “That’s why when you look at the leaders in our industry, their share prices are lower today than they were 30 years ago, when the gold price was a 10th of what it is today,” Garofalo said.

      Rising costs and chronic underfunding are causing a dual squeeze. No new projects are in the pipeline, and he doesn’t expect the situation to reverse any time soon. Instead, he sees sees major companies like Barrick Gold (TSX:ABX,NYSE:GOLD) and Newmont (TSX:NGT,NYSE:NEM) with stagnating reserves and stalled output.

      They can grow their share count, but not the gold they have access to, they’re not creating share value.

      Which gold stocks to focus on now?

      Garofalo suggested that the right space to be in now is the development stage. He thinks the majors are approaching a point where they need to add assets to their portfolios to continue to grow.

      “The industry has basically been giving money back to investors for the last dozen years in dividends and share buybacks and whatnot, and not meaningfully back into the grassroots exploration to replace depleting reserves,” he said.

      Likewise, Giustra backed the idea that the gold sector needs more consolidation.

      “There are far too many companies burning a lot of overhead. The industry needs to consolidate. We need to deliver performance. And so it’s partially the industry’s fault; for a long time, it hasn’t performed. You need to perform economically with your deposits to qualify as an investment sector,” he said.

      Williams added that it’s important for investors to understand what they are looking for. He said that gold can be “a get rich quick scheme, a get rich slow scheme and a stay rich scheme,” depending on where you are in the cycle.

      “That shouldn’t be your only focus. You shouldn’t only be thinking about, ‘Where can I find the 10 baggers?’ If that’s really your mindset, crypto is the perfect vehicle for that, because there’s a 10 bagger produced every minute if you’re lucky enough to get in and get out. This industry is tangible,’ Williams said.

      ‘It’s things you pull out of the ground that are valuable.’

      Securities Disclosure: I, Dean Belder, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

      This post appeared first on investingnews.com

      Shares of GameStop and MicroStrategy were on the rise Monday after Ryan Cohen, CEO of the video game retailer, posted a photo with Michael Saylor, co-founder and chairman of the largest corporate holder of bitcoin.

      GameStop, day traders’ favorite meme stock, climbed more than 7%, while MicroStrategy, which recently rebranded as “Strategy,” saw shares rising as much as 4%. Cohen uploaded the photo over the weekend on X, sparking speculation that GameStop is plotting another strategy around crypto. MicroStrategy shares last traded up 1%.

      The video game company had expanded into digital services in recent years by offering crypto wallets that let users manage their crypto and nonfungible tokens. However, the firm shut the service down in 2023, citing “regulatory uncertainty.”

      Cohen, co-founder of Chewy, bought shares in GameStop in 2020 and joined the board in 2021 as GameStop became one of the key stocks in the WallStreetBets meme trading mania.

      His e-commerce experience fueled hopes that he could help modernize the brick-and-mortar retailer, but the company still struggles to adapt to changing spending habits by gamers. Trading in the stock remains highly volatile and speculative as meme stock personality “Roaring Kitty” continues to spur buying from retail investors.

      Saylor’s Strategy also has a fan base of retail investors as the firm touted its aggressive bitcoin-buying strategy. In the past year, the firm has raised billions of dollars through the sale of stock or convertible bonds for the sole purpose of purchasing more bitcoin.

      Last week, Strategy said it’s almost halfway to its ambitious capital-raising goal as it went on a buying spree throughout the postelection rally. As of Monday, Strategy holds roughly $47 billion worth of bitcoins on its balance sheet, about 2.5% of the total supply.

      This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

      McDonald’s on Monday reported disappointing quarterly revenue, dragged down by weaker-than-expected sales at its U.S. restaurants following an E. coli outbreak just weeks into the quarter.

      But shares of the company rose more than 4% in morning trading as executives predicted sales would improve in 2025.

      Here’s what the company reported compared with what Wall Street was expecting, based on a survey of analysts by LSEG:

      Net sales of $6.39 billion were roughly flat compared with the year-ago period. The company’s overall same-store sales growth of 0.4% outperformed Wall Street’s expectations of same-store sales declines of 1%, according to StreetAccount estimates.

      But McDonald’s U.S. business reported a steeper-than-expected drop in its same-store sales. Same-store sales at the company’s domestic restaurants fell 1.4% in the quarter; Wall Street was projecting same-store sales declines of 0.6%.

      McDonald’s said traffic was slightly positive, but customers spent less than usual during the quarter. Over the summer, the chain rolled out a $5 combo meal to bring back price-conscious diners and reverse sluggish sales. The strategy worked, helping McDonald’s U.S. same-store sales tick up in the third quarter.

      However, analysts have warned that value meals only work if customers also add menu items that aren’t discounted to their orders. McDonald’s executives downplayed those concerns Monday, saying the average check on the $5 meal deal is more than $10.

      The biggest hit to McDonald’s U.S. sales came in late October, when the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention linked a fatal E. coli outbreak to its Quarter Pounder burgers. McDonald’s switched suppliers for its slivered onions, the ingredient fingered as the likely culprit for the outbreak. In early December, the CDC declared the outbreak officially over.

      However, in the days following the news of the outbreak, traffic at McDonald’s U.S. restaurants fell steeply, particularly in the states affected.

      U.S. sales hit their nadir in early November, but began rising again after that. In particular, demand for the Quarter Pounder, a popular core menu item with high margins, fell quickly in the wake of the crisis.

      McDonald’s expects its U.S. sales to recover by the beginning of the second quarter, executives said.

      “I think right now what we’re seeing is that the E. coli impact is now just localized to the areas that had the biggest impact,” CEO Chris Kempczinski said on the company’s conference call. “So think about that as sort of the Rocky Mountain region that was really the epicenter of the issue.”

      The company hopes value deals, along with key menu additions, will help to fuel the recovery this year. In 2025, the burger chain plans to bring back its popular snack wraps, which vanished from menus during pandemic lockdowns, and to introduce a new chicken strip menu item.

      Outside the U.S., sales were stronger. Both of McDonald’s international divisions reported same-store sales increases, bolstering the company’s overall performance.

      The company’s international developmental licensed markets segment, which includes the Middle East and Japan, reported same-store sales growth of 4.1%.

      McDonald’s international operated markets division, which includes some of its biggest markets, reported same-store sales growth of 0.1%. The company said most markets reported same-store sales increases, but the United Kingdom and some other markets saw same-store sales shrink in the quarter. One bright spot was France, which saw its same-store sales turn positive during the quarter after months of weak demand.

      McDonald’s reported fourth-quarter net income of $2.02 billion, or $2.80 per share, down from $2.04 billion, or $2.80 per share, a year earlier.

      Excluding gains tied to the sale of its South Korean business, transaction costs for buying its Israeli franchise and other items, McDonald’s earned $2.83 per share.

      Looking to 2025, the first quarter is expected to be the low point for McDonald’s same-store sales, CFO Ian Borden said, citing a weak start to the year in the U.S., among other factors. Winter storms and wildfires in California weighed on restaurant traffic across the industry in January.

      For the full year, McDonald’s plans to open roughly 2,200 restaurants. About a quarter of those locations will be in the U.S. and its international operated markets. The rest will be in the company’s international developmental licensed markets, including about 1,000 new restaurants in China.

      Including its investments in restaurant openings, McDonald’s plans to spend between $3 billion and $3.2 billion this year on capital expenditures.

      The company is also projecting a headwind of 20 cents to 30 cents per share to its full-year earnings due to foreign currency exchange rates.

      This post appeared first on NBC NEWS