Author

admin

Browsing

After rising 190 percent over the last five years, the uranium spot price and the broader uranium market remain poised for further growth, fueled by short supply and a slew of positive demand catalysts.

At this year’s Vancouver Resource Investment Conference (VRIC), panelists Rick Rule, Nick Hodge, Fabi Lara and Jordan Trimble offered an overview of key market catalysts, both for the near term and long term.

Moderated by Jesse Day of Commodity Culture, the discussion started with a look at the state of the sector.

“We’ve heard a lot about artificial intelligence (AI) data centers (and) small modular reactors, and obviously the main theme underlying all of this is a production shortfall,” said Day on stage at the event.

“There is not enough uranium being produced today to meet current reactor demands.”

From there, Day invited each participant to share their macro overview of the uranium landscape.

Starting the discussion, Hodge, who is publisher at Digest Publishing, pointed to recent comments made by the newly elected Trump administration as evidence of a pro-nuclear stance in America.

“Even the Treasury secretary, during his confirmation hearing, was talking about — not a clean energy race, but an energy race with China, who is building coal plants, who is building something like 29 reactors right now,’ he said.

More broadly, Hodge underscored the growing global commitment to increase nuclear energy production.

“We had a COP meeting late in 2024 where 31 countries agreed to triple nuclear capacity by 2050,’ he said.

‘That’s up from 20 countries the year before that — a 50 percent increase in the number of countries who said they want to triple nuclear capacity.”

Uranium supply challenges not going away

Offering his thoughts, Trimble who is president, CEO and director of Skyharbour Resources (TSXV:SYH,OTCQX:SYHBF) pointed to the substantial shortfall that is already materializing, noting that annual demand stands at 200 million pounds, while mine supply comes in at only 150 million to 160 million pounds.

“The age of abundant secondary supply has come to an end,” he said.

‘(We) don’t have that buffer that we’ve had for the last 50 or 60 years. So as that depletes, the upward pressure on the price not being able to tap into these secondary supplies is going to become more and more extreme.”

Adding to this pressure will be utility companies.

According to Trimble, a sluggish long-term contracting market contributed to uranium’s weak performance in 2024, with utilities securing just 106 million pounds — well below replacement levels.

However, he expects a surge in contracting in 2025, with volumes projected to exceed 180 million pounds as western utilities restock depleted inventories and secure long-term supply.

Longer term, the steady rate of new nuclear reactor builds is also a significant demand catalyst.

As noted by the World Nuclear Association, there are currently 65 reactors being built globally, with another 95 in the design stage. These new builds will join the 440 operational reactors located in 31 countries, as well as Taiwan.

Buying opportunity for uranium investors?

For Lara, who is founder of the Next Big Rush, it’s important to hone in on what may move a specific stock.

“What I look at is what retail looks at, and what retail looks at currently is the spot price,” she said. “There is a massive correlation of spot price moving and the smaller equities moving with it. So that is something that I keep watching.’

She expects financial players to re-enter the uranium market, driving prices higher after last year’s slowdown.

Lara also acknowledged that contracting volumes have remained low; however, term prices have not declined as much as the spot market. She emphasized that the long-term trend remains positive.

Commenting on the smaller crowd size at the panel and uranium sentiment on social media, she suggested that there is a potential buying opportunity as the market regains momentum.

Easy money has been made, ‘sure money’ still on the table

Rounding out the panel was Rule, proprietor at Rule Investment Media.

The veteran investor and speculator also reassured attendees that there is still money to be made in uranium.

“The basic supply, demand fundamentals for uranium are really good,” said Rule.

“I want to say that the easy money has been made. The easy money is made in the transition from hate to love. That’s over, but I think the sure money is ahead of us,’ he explained. “The sure money is ahead of us because of supply and demand imbalances; the sure money is ahead of us because the political winds have changed.”

These tailwinds, paired with utilities contracting, are the factors that signal to Rule that the “sure money” is ahead..

Unlike other commodities, uranium contracts can extend up to 20 years, providing rare top-line certainty, he explained.

This shift is expected to lower the sector’s cost of capital and enable smaller companies with strong deposits to secure financing or facilitate M&A.

Big tech’s AI pursuits need nuclear power

With the nuclear energy renaissance in full swing, supply security is becoming increasingly important. This is especially true in the US, where electricity generated from nuclear reactors supplies almost 20 percent of the nation’s needs.

Despite being the largest market for uranium, US mine supply fills only 5 percent of the country’s demand annually. This makes the US dependent on uranium imports from Canada, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Russia and Australia.

US uranium imports were in sharp focus in May 2024, when then-President Joe Biden signed the Prohibiting Russian Uranium Imports Act, banning Russian-produced low-enriched uranium until 2040. The legislation took effect in August 2024, though limited waivers may be granted until 2028 to support critical US nuclear energy companies.

The US uranium supply picture was further blurred when new President Donald Trump threatened to levy 10 to 25 percent tariffs on a wide range of imports originating from Canada.

Against this backdrop, Amir Adnani, president, CEO and founder of Uranium Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:UEC), painted a picture of opportunity for the US during his VRIC talk with host Jay Martin.

Adnani praised Chris Wright, Trump’s pick for energy secretary, pointing out that he’s an oil and gas executive with ties to small modular reactors. “Because of power demand growth in the US, there is an ‘everything is needed’ mentality and approach to energy in the US,” he said. “And as a result, I think whether we call it American energy dominance or some of these terms, Trump is going to give it, ‘drill, baby drill,’ as he likes to say.”

Adnani explained that Trump’s campaign battle cry served as a signal to the energy sector.

“If you talk to executives in Midland, Texas, for example, they say, ‘Geez, we don’t want to drill anymore.’ The gas boom, the oil markets are oversupplied. But the reality is, when Trump says, ‘drill, baby drill,’ what he really means is ‘energy, energy, energy,’ and that could not be better captured in the trends we’re seeing with technology companies,” he said.

The uranium executive then went on to explain that a single ChatGPT query consumes 100 times more energy than a simple Google search. “When you look at power demand growth in the US for the last 20 years, it was basically flat,” said Adnani. “And now, when you look at power demand growth in the US just to the end of this decade, the next five years, it’s 10 percent annualized growth, and that growth is coming from the tech sector.”

To meet these rising energy needs Adnani sees nuclear as the only viable solution.

“One pound of uranium generates the same amount of energy as 3,000 barrels of oil,” he said.

“These big tech companies are thinking about what kind of power they can use. (Uranium is) going to have the energy density, it’s going to use less land, space, it’s going to need less transportation. Doesn’t need to involve geopolitically unstable regions. They’re really coming to this hard conclusion.”

Stay tuned for more event coverage, including video interviews with many of the experts who attended.

Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Elon Musk is leading a group of investors in offering to buy control of OpenAI for $97.4 billion, The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday.

The bid is for the nonprofit that oversees the artificial intelligence startup, the Journal reported, adding that Musk’s attorney, Marc Toberoff, said he submitted the offer on Monday.

The WSJ cited a statement from Musk provided by Toberoff, saying, “It’s time for OpenAI to return to the open-source, safety-focused force for good it once was.”

In a post on X, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman wrote, “no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.” Musk then replied to the OpenAI chief on X calling him a “swindler,” and in a reply to a different user, called him “Scam Altman.”

Musk, who is a top adviser to President Donald Trump, is in the midst of a heated legal and public relations battle with Altman. They were two of the co-founders of OpenAI in 2015, establishing the entity as a nonprofit focused on AI research.

OpenAI has since emerged as a giant in generative AI, launching ChatGPT in 2022 and setting off a wave of investment in new tools and infrastructure for next-generation AI products and services. SoftBank is close to finalizing a $40 billion investment in OpenAI at a $260 billion valuation, sources told CNBC’s David Faber last week.

Musk now has a competitor in the AI market, a startup called xAI, and is suing OpenAI, accusing it of antitrust violations and to try and keep it from converting into a for-profit corporation.

Meanwhile, OpenAI partnered with SoftBank and Oracle in a project announced by Trump right after his inauguration called Stargate, which calls on the companies to invest billions of dollars in AI infrastructure in the U.S.

Musk’s offer is backed by xAI, which the Journal reports could merge with OpenAI if a deal were to occur. Other investors in the bid include Valor Equity Partners, Baron Capital, 8VC and Ari Emanuel’s investment fund, the paper reported.

Toberoff sent a letter to the attorneys general in California and Delaware on Jan. 7, asking that bidding be opened up for OpenAI.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

In what can be called an indecisive week for the markets, the Nifty oscillated back and forth within a given range and ended the week on a flat note. Over the past five sessions, the Nifty largely remained within a defined range. While it continued resisting the crucial levels, it also failed to develop any definite directional bias throughout the week. The Nifty stayed and moved in the 585-point range. The volatility significantly declined. The India VIX came off by 15.77% to 13.69 on a weekly note. While trading below crucial levels, the headline index closed flat with a negligible weekly gain of 51.55 points (+0.22%).

A few important technical points must be noted as we approach the markets over the coming weeks. Both the 50-Day and 50-Week MA are in very close proximity to each other at 23754 and 23767, respectively. The Nifty has resisted to this point, and so long as it stays below this level, it will remain in the secondary corrective trend. For this secondary trend to reverse, the Nifty will have to move past the 23750-24000 zone, one of the critical market resistance areas. Until we trade below this zone, the best technical rebounds will face resistance here, and the markets will remain vulnerable to profit-taking bouts from higher levels. On the lower side, keeping the head above 23500 will be crucial; any breach of this level will make the markets weaker again.

Monday is likely to see a quiet start to the week; the levels of 23700 and 23960 will act as resistance levels. The supports come in at 23350 and 23000 levels.

The weekly RSI stands at 46.20. It remains neutral and does not show any divergence against the price. The weekly MACD is bearish and stays below its signal line. A Spinning Top occurred on the candles, reflecting the market participants’ indecisiveness.

The pattern analysis weekly charts show that after violating the 50-week MA, the Nifty suffered a corrective decline while forming the immediate swing low of 22800. The subsequent rebound has found resistance again at the 50-week MA at 23767, and the Nifty has retraced once again from that level. The zone of 23700-24000 is now the most immediate and major resistance area for the Nifty over the immediate short term.

Unless the Nifty crosses above the 23700-24000 zone, it will remain in a secondary downtrend. On the lower side, keeping head above the 23500 level will be crucial; any violation of this level will take Nifty towards the 23000 mark. The markets may continue to reflect risk-off sentiment overall. Given the current technical setup, remaining highly selective while making fresh purchases would be prudent. All technical rebounds should be used more to protect gains at higher levels. At the same time, staying invested in stocks with strong or at least improving relative strength while keeping overall leveraged exposures at modest levels is important. A cautious and selective approach is advised for the coming week.


Sector Analysis For The Coming Week

In our look at Relative Rotation Graphs®, we compared various sectors against CNX500 (NIFTY 500 Index), which represents over 95% of the free float market cap of all the stocks listed.

Relative Rotation Graphs (RRG) show defensive and risk-off setups building up in the markets. Nifty Bank, Midcap 100, and Realty Indices are inside the leading quadrant. But all these pockets show a sharp loss of relative momentum against the broader markets.

The Nifty Financial Services Index has slipped inside the weakening quadrant. The Nifty Services Sector and IT indices are inside the weakening quadrant. The Pharma Index is also inside this quadrant but is seen as attempting to improve its relative momentum.

The Nifty Media, Energy, and PSE indices are inside the lagging quadrant.

The Nifty FMCG, Consumption, and Commodities groups have rolled inside the improving quadrant, indicating a likely onset of the phase of relative outperformance. The Auto, Infrastructure, Metal, and PSU Bank indices are inside the improving quadrant. Among these groups, the PSU Bank Index is seen rapidly giving up on its relative momentum.


Important Note: RRG charts show the relative strength and momentum of a group of stocks. In the above Chart, they show relative performance against NIFTY500 Index (Broader Markets) and should not be used directly as buy or sell signals.  


Milan Vaishnav, CMT, MSTA

Consulting Technical Analyst

www.EquityResearch.asia | www.ChartWizard.ae

No Changes In Top-5

At the end of the week ending 2/7, there were no changes in the top-5, but there have been some significant shifts in the bottom 5 sectors. The most notable is the Consumer Staples sector which moved from 10th to 7th and the Healthcare sector which moved from 11th to 8th. Real Estate remained unchanged at the 9th position, while Energy dropped to 10th from 7th and Materials dropped to the last position from 8th.

New Sector Lineup

  1. (1) Consumer Discretionary – (XLY)
  2. (2) Financials – (XLF)
  3. (3) Communication Services – (XLC)
  4. (4) Industrials – (XLI)
  5. (5) Technology – (XLK)
  6. (6) Utilities – (XLU)
  7. (10) Consumer Staples – (XLP)*
  8. (11) Health Care – (XLV)*
  9. (9) Real Estate – (XLRE)
  10. (7) Energy – (XLE)*
  11. (8) Materials – (XLB)*

Weekly RRG

On the weekly RRG, the tails for XLY, XLC, and XLK are (still) inside the leading quadrant. XLK is just crossing over from improving. XLF is inside weakening but at a negative RRG-Heading, and XLI is moving deeper into the lagging quadrant at a negative RRG-Heading.

The most interesting observation on the RRG is that no sectors are currently positioned inside the improving quadrant. The Healthcare sector seems closest to crossing over, but, at the same time, is the sector with the lowest RS-Ratio reading.

Daily RRG

On the daily RRG, we can see why Staples and Healthcare made such big jumps. Both are pushing deeper into the leading quadrant on long tails.

Communication Services and Financials are confirming their positive outlook by continuing to move up on the RS-Ratio scale, with only a minimum loss of relative momentum so far. XLY has returned to the leading quadrant, but has already started to roll over. The positive thing for this sector is that it is all happening very close to the benchmark and on a very short tail.

Technology is the problem child on this RRG. This sector returned into the top-5 last week but is now again showing weakness on this daily RRG at the lowest RS-Ratio reading.

As I mentioned last week, the entry of XLK into the top 5 is not because of its strength but more as a result of weakness in other sectors. It’s all relative.

Consumer Discretionary

XLY is still holding above support, but last week formed a new peak. slightly lower, against the resistance offered by the mid-December peak. This makes the area between 235 and 240 an even more critical barrier now.

Important support remains located around 218. Relative strength is rolling over, but there is enough leeway for a correction after the strong move from August 2024 to now.

Communication Services

Communication Services is continuing to perform well and even managed to close higher than last week, confirming the uptrend in price. As a result, and given the weakness of other sectors and the SPY, relative strength for XLC is continuing to push the XLC tail further into the leading quadrant.

Financials

Financials also managed to put in a higher close for the week, confirming the current uptrend in price.

Relative strength has also taken out its previous high. When both price and RS can hold these trends, the RRG lines will soon turn up again and complete a leading-weakening-leading rotation, underscoring the attractiveness of the financials sector for the time being.

Industrials

Industrials did not manage to reach or take out its previous high and has now put a lower high in place. This still happening inside the rising channel, but it is not a sign of strength, so to say.

A similar thing can be said about the relative strength for XLI. With both RRG lines below a 100 and falling, the tail is being pushed further into the lagging quadrant.

Technology

The technology sector recovered well after a test of the lower boundary of its rising channel.

This is holding relative strength within the boundaries of the trading range which supports the slow improvement of the RRG lines. With RS-Ratio at 100.04, XLK has now just crossed into the leading quadrant.

Portfolio Performance

Shortly after the opening this Monday the portfolio is at a 4.01% gain vs 3.23% for SPY since the start of the year, picking up 0.78%.

Summary

The top-5 remains unchanged this week but in the bottom part of the list some noticeable changes are taking place, primarily in favor of defensive sectors like Healthcare and Consumer Staples, after Utilities already rose to the #6 position last week.

For the time being, the top-5 is still dominated by offensive sectors like XLY,XLC, and XLK. But how long will this last?

#StayAlert and have a great week. –Julius


The market rebounded to start trading on Monday, but indicators on Friday suggest internal weakness. Carl gives us his latest analysis on the market as well as taking a look at Gold which is making more all-time highs. Get Carl’s perspective on the Gold rally.

Besides looking at the market, Carl walked us through the DP Signal Tables and took a look at the Dollar, Gold, Crude Oil, Bonds, Yields, Gold Miners and Bitcoin.

Once he finished with his market review, Carl walked us through the daily and weekly charts of the Magnificent Seven which have mixed reviews on future price action.

Erin took the reins and analyzed sector rotation, concentrating on Energy, Technology and Utilities. She took a look under the hood to see if today’s rallies will catch on or not based on internal participation.

Symbol requests finished out the trading room with looks at various symbols of interest. Erin walked us through the daily and weekly charts with a few looks at 5-minute candlestick charts to time entries and exits.

Join us in the free trading room live to have your symbols reviewed and analyzed by registering ONCE at: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_D6iAp-C1S6SebVpQIYcC6g

We are also running a free two week trial of any of our reports. Use coupon code: DPTRIAL2 at checkout!

01:06 DP Signal Tables

07:35 Market Analysis

20:37 Magnificent Seven

28:05 Sector Rotation

35:51 Symbol Requests


The DP Alert: Your First Stop to a Great Trade!

Before you trade any stock or ETF, you need to know the trend and condition of the market. The DP Alert gives you all you need to know with an executive summary of the market’s current trend and condition. It not only covers the market! We look at Bitcoin, Yields, Bonds, Gold, the Dollar, Gold Miners and Crude Oil! Only $50/month! Or, use our free trial to try it out for two weeks using coupon code: DPTRIAL2. Click HERE to subscribe NOW!


Learn more about DecisionPoint.com:


Watch the latest episode of the DecisionPointTrading Room on DP’s YouTube channel here!


Try us out for two weeks with a trial subscription!

Use coupon code: DPTRIAL2 Subscribe HERE!


Technical Analysis is a windsock, not a crystal ball. –Carl Swenlin


(c) Copyright 2025 DecisionPoint.com


Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author, and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

DecisionPoint is not a registered investment advisor. Investment and trading decisions are solely your responsibility. DecisionPoint newsletters, blogs or website materials should NOT be interpreted as a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security or to take any specific action.


Helpful DecisionPoint Links:

Trend Models

Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO)

On Balance Volume

Swenlin Trading Oscillators (STO-B and STO-V)

ITBM and ITVM

SCTR Ranking

Bear Market Rules


Have you ever held on too long to a winning position? You watch as that former top performer in your portfolio slows down, and then rotates lower, and then really begins to deteriorate, and you just watch it all happen without taking action?

If the answer is “yes”, then you have fallen victim to one of the more frustrating of the behavioral biases called “endowment bias”. Basically, we feel unable to let go of this position because of our emotional attachment, and we hold on to a losing position despite very clear technical signs that we should do otherwise!

Today I’ll share three technical analysis techniques that I’ve found helpful to cut my losses, minimize the crippling impact of endowment bias, and preserve my portfolio through challenging periods.

When in Doubt, Follow the Trend

The biggest issue I find when it comes to endowment bias is that investors simply ignore clear signs on the chart. As my mentor Ralph Acampora once told me, “Analyzing the chart is the easy part. Actually doing what the chart tells you? That’s the tough part!”

The chart of Intel Corp. (INTC) in early 2024 shows how a stock can rotate from a period of accumulation to a period of distribution. In late 2023, INTC was making higher highs and higher lows, the price above two upward-sloping moving averages. The RSI was mostly above the 40 level, representing a bullish range for this momentum indicator. The relative strength (bottom panel) was steadily trending higher, demonstrating that INTC was outperforming the S&P 500.

By April of 2024, literally all of the previous bullet points had changed from bullish to bearish. INTC was now breaking down through moving average support, the moving averages were beginning to slope lower, and the RSI had moved to a bearish range below 60.

Think of technical indicators like a checklist, and go through the process of evaluating each indicator on the chart to determine whether the current reading is bullish or bearish. And when you get to a point when the bearish evidence outweighs in the bullish, then move on to better opportunities!

Relative Strength Can Bring Additional Clarity

Sometimes a stock will stop going higher, but instead of breaking down it enters a new consolidation phase. Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) showed this particular phenomenon in 2024, as it entered a trading range between $400 and $460 after a new all-time high in July.

Now even though the price trend was now sideways, note how the relative strength line began to trend steadily lower. This pattern emerged because MSFT was holding support, so the price trend was still in decent shape, but other stocks were continuing to pound out a strong second half to 2024.

When you’re holding a stock with deteriorating relative strength, your “opportunity cost alarm” should be going off big time. Basically, while you’re not necessarily losing money holding this particular stock, there are other stocks out there that are still moving higher. So by tying up your capital in this particular stock, you’re missing out on other opportunities to outperform!

Institutional investors tend to be laser-focused on relative strength, as that is pretty much exactly how they are evaluated as active managers. So think like an institutional investor, and if your charts begin to feature weakening relative strength, look around for other places to outperform.

Divergences are Often an Early Warning Signal

Parts of the technical toolkit can be used more as leading indicators than lagging indicators. I’ve found bearish momentum divergences to provide excellent early warning signals, because they will raise a red flag while the primary uptrend is still in place.

The chart of Synchrony Financial (SYF) still appears in decent shape, with a pattern of higher highs and higher lows continuing through early 2025. But notice how the RSI has actually been making lower peaks since early November, despite the stronger price action?

SYF and similar names will usually find a place on my “potential topping patterns” ChartList, helping me focus on charts that are still going higher yet demonstrating similar characteristics to previous market tops. I’m happy to still own a chart like SYF as long as the price keeps showing strength, but the bearish divergence tells me to be ready to take profits if the impending drop becomes a reality.

Mindless investors ignore clear signs of price deterioration because endowment bias prevents them from admitting a change in the technical evidence. Mindful investors, however, have a consistent process for evaluating their holdings, and are more easily able to admit when a chart is no longer helping them achieve their portfolio goals.

RR#6,

Dave

P.S. Ready to upgrade your investment process? Check out my free behavioral investing course!


David Keller, CMT

President and Chief Strategist

Sierra Alpha Research LLC


Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

The author does not have a position in mentioned securities at the time of publication. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

Graphene has the potential to spur advances in a variety of sectors, from transport to medicine to electronics. Unfortunately, the high cost of graphene production has slowed commercialization.

Graphene prices have come down substantially from its early days, when it reportedly cost tens of thousands of dollars to make a piece of high-quality graphene the size of a postage stamp.

However, the 21st century wonder material remains expensive. Specific graphene pricing data is hard to come by, but relatively recent estimates peg the commercial cost of graphene in a range of US$100 to US$10,000 per kilogram. The wide variance is mainly because the price of graphene is determined by a number of factors, such as production method, form, quality and quantity.

Graphene has many exciting applications. Notably, its properties have been applied to graphene-polymer composites. Together, these carbon-based materials are effective in energy, biomedicine, aerospace and electronics applications. In addition, graphene can be used for water purification due to its naturally occurring water-repellent properties.

Other key applications of graphene include graphene-conductive inks, which can be used for printed electronics in applications like logic circuits, inkjet printing, environmental sensors and smart clothing.

Here’s a look at how graphene is made, and why the production process plays a key role in graphene cost.

In this article

    What is the origin of graphene?

    Graphene’s origin story is by now well known. The 2D material was first produced in 2004, when two professors at the University of Manchester used Scotch tape to peel flakes of it off a chunk of graphite.

    The story gives the impression that it’s easy to make graphene, but that’s not entirely true. The Scotch tape method, while a fun party trick, can only produce a very small amount of graphene — certainly not enough to use commercially.

    How is graphene made?

    The Scotch tape method of making graphene is known as exfoliation, and there are other ways to create graphene via exfoliated graphite as well. For instance, a diamond wedge can cleave graphene layers.

    But what are some other ways of making graphene? Currently, the most popular method is chemical vapor deposition (CVD). The deposition process involves a mix of gases reacting with a surface to create a graphene layer. The process creates high-quality graphene, but the graphene is often damaged when it comes time to detach it from its substrate.

    Looking at the process in greater depth, Graphenea states that another problem with CVD is that it’s difficult to create a totally uniform layer of graphene on a substrate. Graphenea also notes that much work is being put into reducing problems with CVD. For example, scientists are experimenting with treating the substrate before the reaction that creates graphene takes place. Even so, it’s expected to take a long time for the wrinkles to be smoothed out.

    The Graphene Flagship identifies a number of other ways of making graphene, including direct chemical synthesis; the material can also be made by putting natural graphite in a solution.

    Some of the latest innovations in graphene creation don’t involve the use of chemicals and can be conducted in the open air, as opposed to in vacuums. One method that was patented in 2017 is able to create larger quantities of graphene using acetylene, oxygen and a spark plug. Unfortunately, this process creates unrefined chunks of material and not sheets, meaning more money must be spent to make the graphene chunks useable.

    In 2021, the Indian Institute of Technology Patna developed a way to produce graphene using a plasma gun; it’s possible it will prove to be a cheaper, yet scalable route to producing high-quality graphene material. The method has been shown to produce single-layer graphene 85 percent of the time without hazardous chemicals or expensive solvents, and estimates show that doing so only costs about US$1.12 per gram of graphene.

    In mid-2022, chemical manufacturing company CleanGraph announced its proprietary process for transforming graphite into graphene, saying it had been developed over the past four years with the help of partnerships with market leaders in the construction industry and prominent universities. This method of producing graphene reportedly reduces the environmental impact by 99 percent compared to traditional graphene production.

    ‘Expanded graphite is a layered nanocarbon material, which is produced at industrial scale by oxidative intercalation and high-temperature expansion of natural graphite. CleanGraph is a novel proprietary process to chemically modify graphite into various forms of graphene in a faster, more productive and ecologically friendly way,’ as per the company.

    Along with construction materials, the graphene produced by this method can also be used for heating, battery technology and as a sorbent.

    More recently, in late 2023 NanoXplore (TSX:GRA,OTCQX:NNXPF) unveiled a new proprietary large-scale dry process for manufacturing graphene based on advanced exfoliation technology. It has a lower CAPEX compared to liquid-based exfoliation methods.

    ‘The technology finds potential applications in batteries and lightweight composites, enhancing its appeal in cutting-edge industries,’ states the company. ‘This new manufacturing process also opens doors to a myriad of applications, including plastic pipes, geosynthetics, recycled plastics, concrete, drilling fluids, and insulation foams, among others.’

    Click here for a deeper dive on companies developing graphene and graphene products.

    What factors impact graphene cost?

    Getting an understanding of how graphene is produced is crucial to understanding graphene cost. That’s because the way in which graphene is made has a major impact on how much it ultimately costs.

    Echo Zhang, founder of China-based graphene technology company GrapheneRich, explains that CVD and liquid-phase exfoliation are the most expensive methods due to the ‘advanced equipment and high energy consumption required.’ Meanwhile, the chemical reduction of graphene oxide is cheaper but may produce lower quality material.

    Graphene oxide, which has advanced composite, biotechnology and water filtration applications, can cost between US$100 and US$500 per kilogram. ‘The price can vary depending on the oxidation level, production method, and supplier,’ Zhang states.

    Graphenea also highlights that while graphene oxide is relatively inexpensive to produce, its lower quality means it can’t be used in batteries, flexible touch screens and ‘other advanced opto-electronic applications.’

    In contrast, CVD graphene, which Zhang calls ‘top-tier graphene’ resulting in a ‘high-performance material with excellent properties,’ fetches upwards of US$10,000 or more per kilogram. Its often used in advanced electronics and energy-storage systems.

    ‘Methods like CVD, which produce high-quality, high-purity graphene, are generally more expensive than liquid-phase exfoliation or reduction of graphene oxide,’ Zhang explains. ‘The production method affects both the quality and the cost of the final product.’

    Commercial-grade graphene can be produced in larger quantities, resulting in a price range of US$100 to US$1,000 per kilogram. This grade of graphene is used in energy storage, sensors and composites. ‘These prices depend on the production scale and the quality of the graphene being produced,’ Zhang states.

    The issue, of course, is that with few commercial applications for graphene yet available, few end-users are looking to buy the material in large quantities.

    What is the future of graphene research?

    Those involved in graphene research hope that ultimately more commercial applications for the material will be developed, spurring advances that will make cost-effective mass production of the material a reality.

    Graphene products are making their way into next-generation electronics such as flexible and foldable screens, enhanced batteries and ‘lightning-speed’ computers.

    Graphene can also be used to create more fuel-efficient cars, faster and lighter aircraft and paint that could end deterioration of ships and cars. Overall, there’s no shortage of applications for graphene products.

    Graphene’s impressive properties and the fact that it’s made from carbon, much like human bodies, makes it well suited to biotechnologies, including tools that can help healthcare professionals scan a patient’s biosignals quickly, accurately and safely.

    “Graphene is a single layer of carbon molecules,” explained Dr. Kiana Aran, chief scientific officer at Cardea Bio, and Keck Graduate Institute associate professor of bioengineering. “Everything in our body is made of carbon. It’s the most compatible material we can find that has amazing electronic properties. You can build electronics and conjugate with biology, without impacting … biology and without biology impacting it.”

    Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology have created the first functional semiconductor made from graphene. As an alternative to silicon, the breakthrough has the potential to allow for smaller and faster electronic devices, which may have applications for quantum computing.

    In terms of market growth, Grand View Research notes, ‘Market growth stage is high, and pace of the market growth is accelerating. Graphene market is characterized by a high degree of innovation owing to rising advancements driven by factors including research and development. Subsequently, innovative applications are constantly emerging, disrupting existing industries and creating new ones.’

    The market research firm projects that the graphene market will see revenues grow at a compound annual growth rate of 35.1 percent between 2024 and 2030 to reach US$1.61 billion. The automotive, aerospace and medical industries are the core drivers of demand for the material. Graphene’s role as a powerful catalyst in the chemical industry is also expected to contribute to increased demand for the wonder material on a global scale.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, currently hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    There’s been a great deal of speculation surrounding a potential Starlink initial public offering (IPO), and the idea of an impending Starlink stock release date has investors excited.

    Elon Musk’s satellite internet business been referred to by many as the future of global connectivity, offering low latency and high speed in even the most remote locations. The company controls roughly 7,000 satellites and recently surpassed over 4 million subscribers.

    One reason for this interest is Musk’s reputation in the investment space, as he has been involved in multiple highly successful and high-profile tech companies. Starlink itself is an offshoot of one of his other companies, SpaceX.

    Even without Musk’s involvement, Starlink has immense market potential. A lack of connectivity is one of the most significant bugbears facing the proliferation of technology like autonomous vehicles and the internet of things. By removing this restriction, Starlink could cultivate a flood of invention and innovation and allow edge computing to thrive.

    The company’s satellites have been deployed in countries around the world in recent years. In June 2023, parent company SpaceX was awarded a contract by the Pentagon in the US to provide internet terminals for use in Ukraine. A few months later, following the launch of its war on Hamas, Israel entered into talks with SpaceX to secure the use of Starlink satellites as a backup communications system.

    Additionally, the company launched a US$90 million deal with Mexico in November 2023 to provide free internet to remote regions, and Telstra Group (ASX:TLS,OTC Pink:TTRAF) became one of the first service providers to offer Starlink connectivity to rural Australians in July of that year.

    More recently, the company has been making significant inroads into African countries, including Zimbabwe, Niger, Liberia, and Musk’s native country of South Africa.

    In September 2024, Starlink inked a contract with United Airlines to provide in-flight wifi. A few months later, Starlink secured a deal with the Canadian province of Ontario to bring high-speed satellite internet access to homes and businesses in rural, remote and northern communities beginning in June 2025.

    Will Starlink go public? Although a Starlink IPO has yet to be officially announced, there has been a great deal of speculation, and some experts have suggested that the occasion may be closer than many realize. That speculation has increased with US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House, and the possibility of more lucrative contracts for the satellite technology company. With that in mind, those considering a Starlink investment must ensure they understand the company and its technology as soon as possible.

    In this article

      What is satellite internet?

      A satellite internet connection transmits and receives data via a network of near-Earth satellites. Though this technology isn’t new, it has evolved considerably over the past several years. At the time of its inception, it was generally only used by subscribers in remote areas who had few other options for connectivity.

      The history of satellite internet traces back to 1962, with the world’s first commercial communication satellite. Known as Telstar 1, the satellite was launched by NASA in response to Russia’s successful launch of the satellite Sputnik 1. It had a short life, however; Telstar launched one day after high-altitude nuclear weapons testing, and radiation from the tests damaged electronics on the satellite. It was only operational for seven months before it was rendered inoperable.

      Interestingly, the idea of transmitting information via satellite wasn’t new at the time of Telstar’s launch. Decades earlier, astronautics theorist Herman Potočnik first proposed the concept of geostationary orbital satellites in his 1929 book ‘Das Problem der Befahrung des Weltraums: der Raketen-Motor,’ which translates to ‘The Problem with Space Travel: the Rocket Motor.’ Renowned futurist Arthur C. Clarke would later cite Potočnik’s work in a 1945 paper envisioning satellite communication.

      The first real use of satellite internet would not occur until the late 20th century via the Teledisc project, funded by Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT). First proposed in 1994, Teledisc planned to establish a network of low-orbit broadband satellites. Unfortunately, the project was rendered defunct in 2002 shortly after the failure of two similar ventures, Iridium and Globalstar.

      One year later, in 2003, French satellite operator Eutelsat became the first company in the world to launch a successful satellite internet project. Since then, multiple service providers and telecommunications companies have dabbled in satellite connectivity. However, it has largely lagged behind its technological peers, primarily only seeing use in particularly isolated regions.

      To explain why, we need to first explain the different types of internet. The two most common are land-based connections and cellular or mobile connections.

      Landline internet uses telephone lines, coaxial cables or dedicated fiber-optic cables to send and receive data from a modem or router. This device then serves as an access point, allowing everything from computers to smart home appliances to connect to the internet. Mobile internet, meanwhile, leverages nearby cell phone towers to beam data directly to and from connected devices.

      Traditional satellite internet is something of a fusion between mobile and landline, albeit over a vastly larger distance. It leverages a satellite dish connected to two modems. One modem is used for sending data and the other for receiving.

      Historically, speed and capacity represent the two most significant drawbacks to satellite internet. Most satellite internet service providers only support speeds between 25 and 300 megabits per second (mbps). By contrast, landline fiber internet is capable of speeds up to 5 gigabits per second (gbps). Satellite internet also tends to be far costlier than a comparable landline connection, with higher latency and lower caps on data usage. It may also suffer from issues with reliability. Lastly, satellite internet may suffer from interference due to factors such as terrain or canopy coverage.

      That brings us around to what makes Starlink exciting. Although not yet competitive with landline internet in terms of cost, the company offers considerably higher data caps and speeds than any other provider on the market — up to 500 mbps with a 1 terabyte cap. Starlink’s low-orbit satellites are also less vulnerable to geographic interference while offering more consistent and reliable coverage.

      Does Starlink have an IPO date?

      At the time of this writing, Starlink is not publicly traded, and there is no concrete date for a Starlink IPO. Hints of a possible Starlink IPO originally came from several tweets made by Musk in 2021.

      ‘Once we can predict cash flow reasonably well, Starlink will IPO,’ he explained at the time. ‘(It will be) at least a few years before Starlink revenue is reasonably predictable. Going public sooner than that would be very painful.’

      Musk added later that year that Starlink’s parent company SpaceX ‘needs to pass through a deep chasm of negative cashflow over the next year or so to make Starlink financially viable.’

      At the time, Musk said a Starlink IPO wasn’t likely until at least 2025 or later.

      It’s no surprise then that market watchers’ eyebrows rose when listening to SpaceX President and Chief Operating Officer Gwynne Shotwell speak at the February 2023 Commercial Space Transportation Conference. While discussing a planned testing milestone for SpaceX’s rockets, Shotwell claimed that 2023 was the year Starlink would make money.

      She added that the company had a cashflow-positive quarter in 2022. There was also SpaceX’s reported revenue for 2022 — just over US$3.3 billion, US$1 billion of which originated from Starlink.

      In early November 2023, Musk reported that Starlink had once again “achieved breakeven cashflow.’

      Shortly after, an anonymous source told Bloomberg that a Starlink IPO could be on the table for 2024. But Musk quickly fired back in a post on X that the report was “false.”

      It seems fairly clear based on Musk’s comments that we shouldn’t expect a Starlink IPO anytime soon. So why is there so much speculation that one is just around the corner?

      Well, for one thing Starlink sales dominated SpaceX’s 2023 revenues, meaning the company made more money as an internet provider than as a space rocket company. Starlink revenues topped a massive US$4.2 billion that year, compared to US$3.5 billion for the firm’s core rocket launch business.

      Of course, these figures should be taken with a very large grain of salt. As is too often the case in technology investing, there is no shortage of hype surrounding Starlink, much of it drummed up by Musk himself. An April 2024 BNN Bloomberg article points out that even with all that revenue, Starlink “is still burning through more cash than it brings in.” Based on anonymous inside sources, Starlink accounting is “more of an art than a science.’

      Even if those numbers are inflated, the company does show promise, and analysts are still optimistic that a Starlink IPO is on the horizon. Justus Parmar, founder and CEO of venture capital firm Fortuna Investments, told Reuters he’s eyeing 2025 or 2026. “(Musk’s) waiting for a level of stability or predictability in revenue,” he said. Once the IPO is official, Parmar believes it will “be an extremely strong catalyst for everything space related.”

      How can you get exposure before the Starlink IPO date?

      While it’s impossible to invest directly in Starlink, you may be able to get a head start by investing in Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), as Musk stated he’ll ‘do his best’ to give preference to long-term Tesla shareholders. Additionally, there are platforms such as Hiive that enable accredited investors to purchase shares of pre-IPO companies, including SpaceX.

      Fortunately, you have several options if you simply want to invest in satellite internet and aren’t particularly attached to the idea of Starlink. In spite of their failed efforts in the early 2000s, both Iridium Communications (NASDAQ:IRDM) and Globalstar (NYSEAMERICAN:GSAT) are currently going strong. Globalstar’s performance is especially promising, as the company’s share price has increased in value by almost 300 percent over the past five years as of mid-January 2025.

      EchoStar (NASDAQ:SATS) is another satellite provider that’s performed strongly in recent years. Other potential satellite internet investments include ViaSat (NASDAQ:VSAT) and Gilat Satellite Networks (NASDAQ:GILT).

      As with any investment, it’s important to do your research and speak to an accredited brokerage or investment advisor before you commit any capital.

      Investor takeaway

      From an investment perspective, Starlink displays incredible promise. The company’s ties to Musk, a man with an established track record of successful technology startups, has generated considerable interest out of the gate. Yet even ignoring the connection to Musk, Starlink has a massive potential addressable market thanks to ongoing demand for better connectivity and a relative dearth of viable options for edge computing.

      Trends such as distributed work and the proliferation of internet of things devices will only further drive this demand.

      With that said, it’s best to exercise a degree of restraint where Starlink is concerned. Although the company will very likely be a sound investment once it or SpaceX goes public, there is currently a great deal of exaggerated hype and speculation surrounding it. Anyone who chooses to add Starlink shares to their portfolio if the company does go public should first ensure they understand what to expect — something they cannot do by listening to hype alone.

      Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

      This post appeared first on investingnews.com

      Here’s a recap of the crypto landscape for Monday (February 10) as of 9:00 p.m. UTC.

      Bitcoin and Ethereum price update

      Bitcoin is trading at US$97,304, reflecting a 1.1 percent increase over the past 24 hours.

      The day’s trading range has reached a high of US$97,896 and a low of US$96,882.

      Meanwhile, Ethereum is priced at US$2,679.41, up 1.6 percent over the same period. The cryptocurrency reached an intraday high of US$2,689 and a low of US$2,645.

      Altcoin price update

      • Solana (SOL) is currently valued at US$200.82, marking a 0.6 percent increase over the past 24 hours. The cryptocurrency hit a daily high of US$207.25 and a low of US$201.15.
      • XRP is at US$2.43, up 0.8 percent. It reached an intraday high of US$2.45 and a low of US$2.41.
      • Sui (SUI) is trading at US$3.24, up 5.6 percent. It achieved a daily high of US$3.28 and a low of US$3.23.
      • Cardano (ADA) is priced at US$0.7045, reflecting a 3.3 percent increase over 24 hours. Its highest price on Monday was US$0.7104 and its lowest was US$0.6969.

      Crypto news to know

      Japan-based Bitcoin treasury company Metaplanet (OTCQX:MTPLF,TSE:3350) released its full-year 2024 earnings on Monday, revealing roughly US$36 million in unrealized gains from the purchase of 1,761 Bitcoin.

      The company said it acquired the coins for roughly US$137 million.

      Metaplanet’s shareholder base grew by 500 percent last year, primarily due to the issuance of new shares to fund its Bitcoin acquisition strategy. This growth was facilitated by both debt and equity financing.

      Metaplanet said it will increase its Bitcoin holdings to 10,000 Bitcoin by the end of 2025, and 21,000 Bitcoin by the end of 2026. The company’s shares closed up 17.37 percent on Monday afternoon.

      CoinShares data shows Ether exchange-traded product (ETPs) inflows outpaced inflows to Bitcoin ETPs during last week’s market decline. Ether ETPs recorded US$793 million in inflows, 95 percent more than Bitcoin’s recorded inflows of US$407 million. Total year-to-date inflows to digital asset investment products have reached US$7.3 billion.

      According to CoinShares’ James Butterfill, last week’s price fall resulted in significant buying on weakness.

      Strategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) resumed buying Bitcoin last week, acquiring 7,633 Bitcoin for approximately US$742.4 million in cash at an average price of roughly US$97,255 per coin, as per US Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

      Strategy’s Michael Saylor hinted at another impending Bitcoin acquisition on Sunday (February 9) morning, posting a screenshot of the Saylor Tracker, a tool that monitors and tracks Strategy’s Bitcoin holdings.

      “Death to the blue lines. Long live the green dots,’ he wrote on X, formerly Twitter. Market watchers have come to recognize these posts as indicators of the company’s upcoming Bitcoin purchases.

      Meanwhile, fraud allegations have resulted in a rapid pullback for $CAR, a meme coin launched on Sunday by the Central African Republic. President Faustin-Archange Touadera described the coin as an ‘experiment’ to raise the country’s global profile and showcase how a meme-based token can support national development.

      However, shortly after $CAR’s launch, the coin’s X account was suspended, and allegations of fraud soon surfaced, with deepfake checker tool Deepware flagging a video statement from Touadera as suspicious. The news has caused $CAR’s price to pull back over 92 percent, from US$0.79 to US$0.05 as of Monday afternoon.

      Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

      Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

      This post appeared first on investingnews.com